Friday, November 21, 2008

《轉錄》劉軒準博士變DJ 室友啟蒙

其實我覺得劉墉跟劉軒的名字,總讓人聯想到那些八股教條、和關於他們父子倆之間互動的立志小品。但是somehow我還是想把這篇po出來,可能是因為它的最後一段...
--

卅六歲的劉軒,八歲起就在美國受教育,從小學古典鋼琴,在哈佛的黑人DJ室友讓他看見不一樣的世界,他放下哈佛博士學位,成了知名DJ,不僅波士頓的舞廳(Club)、私人派對和電台指名要他營造氣氛,在台灣的新世代心中,「DJ劉軒」的名號比作家父親劉墉更響亮。(聯合新聞網2008-11-21)

不同世代呈現的哈佛印象,呈現哈佛的多元面貌。從大學到研究所,劉軒走走停停,前後花了十年,沒有李念祖那一輩的寒窗清苦和負笈異國求功名的心理壓力,現在看來彷彿在「度長假」。

劉軒曾在對台灣學子演講時,坦言自己念研究所是「因為當時不知道要幹嘛」。他形容,這讓現場學生倒抽了一口氣。

這口氣值得研究。學生是因為發現青年樣本也會迷惘而欣喜,還是發現這完美成品竟有瑕疵而失望?答案是前者,劉軒說,好多學生跟他說悄悄話:「其實我也是。」

對劉軒來說,哈佛像是思考人生價值的心靈場域,「它什麼都教,就是沒教你怎麼賺錢。」當外界還把哈佛文憑當成邁向成功的入場券時,劉軒已經明白:上哈佛就是學習如何推翻成功和失敗的定義,尋找自己。

延伸閱讀

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

台北市政府文化局替代役服勤心得

我原本想亂寫一通的,寫著寫著卻不知道為什麼越來越自以為正經八百~哈。給對替代役生活有興趣的人一個藉以窺探的window...

57梯 沈育德
民國97年11月19日

光陰荏苒,在文化局服務轉眼間已經滿七個月了。在這期間我吸收了許多新的知識、學到了許多待人處世的態度和方法,可以說是一個十分難得的經驗。以下是我的心得分享。

早晨閱報、剪報,是我每天必做的功課。為了將重要的文化政策相關新聞建檔以便同仁們日後使用、並且挑選適當的要聞列印提供副局長參考,我每天都會閱讀大量的新聞,甚至包括許多與文化無關的政治、經濟、科技等各方面的時事。起初我對於這樣瑣碎的任務感到些許不耐,因為找到適當的新聞建檔、製作摘要,需要儘可能在很短的時間內過濾無關的資訊,所以常常感到眼花撩亂、或者難以聚焦。然而在逐漸熟能生巧之後,我不但就篩選新聞內容的工作開始有所掌握,同時也意外地、對於整個國內甚至國際社會大環境有更深層的、多面向的了解,讓我在看事情的角度上更為成熟而客觀。我想,閱報將會是我從文化局退役之後,一輩子受用的好習慣。

送公文大概是我的第二項重要任務吧。時常在和友人聊天時,被問到我來往府會、以及各個局處單位遞送公文的工作。他們總是笑著說,我大概是府內最高學歷的跑腿工;但實際上在這個看似簡單的工作中,我也得到了許多可貴的經驗。除了對市府大樓裡三十多個局處如何分工有了基本的認識,在兩次的議會總質詢以及無數次的例行性會議裡,我也看到各局處的長官、甚至市長如何在議會裡迎擊議員們的無情砲火。至於議員、媒體、市政官員三方微妙的權力制衡關係——時而握手寒暄、時而口誅筆伐、時而合作時而對立——之間所採取的各種姿態、說辭、手腕,讓身為台上的官員與底下的幕僚之間傳遞資訊的管道之一的我,看得戰戰兢兢、也趣味盎然。我想,這輩子也許找不到其他的機會,進行這樣有趣的觀察了?

文化局的活動很多,尤其在我們服勤期間剛好碰到夏天,一連串的台北電影節、藝穗節、雙年展、數位藝術節、詩歌節……多到令人目不暇給。很高興能夠參與第十屆台北電影獎晚會的準備工作。因為這樣的因緣際會,我不但和以色列駐台辦事處的長官得以有業務上的接觸、親眼目睹了侯孝賢導演、鈕承澤導演、林書宇導演、張鈞甯、劉若英……等多位導演以及演員的丰采,更見證了《海角七號》在上映之前獲得百萬首獎的、在台灣影史上具特殊意義的那一刻。(如今回想,當下我並沒發覺在那閃閃星光的背後,原來暗地裡正風起雲湧著這股新興的電影「產業」趨勢。)而日前在台北影視節中,侯導就電影產業在財務面必須進行的諸多革新所發表的見解,對於將電影視為人生志業的我來說,也提供了更宏觀、同時卻也是最根本的,觀念上的啟發。

文化工作如同教育一樣,是百年大計,因為文化無孔不入地存在於我們的生活、以及我們的一言一行之中。能夠在這樣的單位服務,並站在一定的高度慢慢地去觀察、思辨、抽絲剝繭,對一個原本該每天戴著鋼盔步槍爬好漢坡的我來說,我想是再幸運不過了。而就服役期間的生活起居而言,擔任管理幹部替大家服務、或者每天夜裡躺在寢室內和同學學弟們談天說地,都是最值得令人開心的事。因此我由衷地感謝局長室和人事室的長官們對我的關心、指導,以及同袍們的相互支持照顧。這七個月,我想,我沒有白白浪費。

延伸閱讀

和成HCG + 楊惠珊 = 禪風馬桶

台灣開始有像LV一樣可以賺老外的錢的東西了。
酷到不行。

行銷手法靈活的和成衛浴,繼請林志玲擔任代言人引起話題後,又邀琉璃工房創辦人楊惠姍親自操刀,設計具中國禪風、鑲上琉璃的造型馬桶,日前在上海發表;這款新品,未來計畫引進台灣、印尼等全球市場。(聯合新聞網 2008-11-19)

和成中國董事長邱士楷表示,經過北京奧運的試煉與洗禮,大陸崛起的消費市場與文化影響力,不可忽視,因此,和成計畫在大陸推出大師系列作品,邀請各界頂級藝術大師設計,首部作品是由兩岸都很知名的琉璃工房楊惠姍操刀,未來產品也將回銷台灣。

琉璃與馬桶,楊惠姍笑說,這是有趣的結合。她爆料,另一半張毅在馬桶上的時間實在很長,而且廁所已經逐漸發展成一座小書房;當初和成邀請合作時,她立刻冥想,張毅要坐在什麼樣的馬桶上?在竹林中、透出點陽光,一個中國意象十足的石凳,便成為這款以「中國石頭」為名的馬桶原型。

一接下任務,楊惠姍與張毅立刻做功課,他倆翻遍世界衛浴產品的型錄、雜誌,要做出獨一無二的設計,而且還要把透光的琉璃鑲在馬桶上。

不過,張毅卻調侃楊惠姍,說當初一眼看到設計原型時,馬桶與臉盆造型是由各種斜切面構成,心想和成一定很頭痛,要產品化難度相當高,尤其又碰上處女座、A型、意志力超堅強的楊惠姍,經過一年半和成很努力地配合調整與試做,作品才誕生。

和成集團執行長陳尚賢笑說,在設計過程中,要盡量尊重藝術家的原創精神,所以在楊惠姍面前,和成聲音很微弱,一年半下來,和成因為馬桶蓋與座墊的設計,無法符合楊惠姍的原創與概念,還解雇負責的員工。

在發表會現場,楊惠姍不住地撫著一手設計的馬桶,她說,其實,馬桶跟人有「肌膚之親」,比沙發還要貼近人體,因此,生活中能有個賞心悅目的馬桶,頗為重要。

另外,要把透光性很強的琉璃置入馬桶上,而且符合中國意象,楊惠姍也頗費心思,透明的琉璃有潑墨山水的紋路,每個手工打造的琉璃要以人工方式鑲在馬桶蓋上,就連沖水按鈕也是琉璃工藝品。

邱士楷說,這款作品在蘇州生產,會先在大陸地區銷售,未來將會引進台灣。由於全球面臨經濟衰退,和成逆向操作,以大師系列來提升產品與企業形象,今年和成集團業績成長約兩成,明年業績成長率應不會減少,預計在兩成上下。

延伸閱讀

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

《轉錄》Saving the Story (the Film Version)

LOS ANGELES — The movie world has been fretting for years about the collapse of stardom. Now there are growing fears that another chunk of film architecture is looking wobbly: the story.



Frank Moss, right, of the M.I.T. Media Lab, and David Kirkpatrick, left, of the Center for Future Storytelling, with a friend.(New York Times 2008-11-17)

In league with a handful of former Hollywood executives, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Laboratory plans to do something about that on Tuesday, with the creation of a new Center for Future Storytelling.

The center is envisioned as a “labette,” a little laboratory, that will examine whether the old way of telling stories — particularly those delivered to the millions on screen, with a beginning, a middle and an end — is in serious trouble.

Its mission is not small. “The idea, as we move forward with 21st-century storytelling, is to try to keep meaning alive,” said David Kirkpatrick, a founder of the new venture.

Once president of the Paramount Pictures motion picture group, Mr. Kirkpatrick last year joined some former colleagues in starting Plymouth Rock Studios, a planned Massachusetts film production center that will provide a home for M.I.T.’s storytelling lab while supporting it with $25 million over seven years.

Arguably, the movies are as entertaining as ever. With a little help from holiday comedies like “Yes Man” with Jim Carrey and “Bedtime Stories” with Adam Sandler, the domestic motion picture box office appears poised to match last year’s gross revenues of $9.7 billion, a record.

But Mr. Kirkpatrick and company are not alone in their belief that Hollywood’s ability to tell a meaningful story has been nibbled at by text messages, interrupted by cellphone calls and supplanted by everything from Twitter to Guitar Hero.

“I even saw a plasma screen above a urinal,” said Peter Guber, the longtime film producer and former chairman of Sony Pictures Entertainment who contends that traditional narrative — the kind with unexpected twists and satisfying conclusions — has been drowned out by noise and visual clutter.

A common gripe is that gamelike, open-ended series like “Pirates of the Caribbean” or “Spider-Man” have eroded filmmakers’ ability to wrap up their movies in the third act. Another is that a preference for proven, outside stories like the Harry Potter books is killing Hollywood’s appetite for original storytelling.

Mr. Guber, who teaches a course at the University of California, Los Angeles, called “Navigating in a Narrative World,” is singularly devoted to story. Almost 20 years ago Mr. Guber made a colossal hit of Warner Brothers“Batman” after joining others in laboring over the story for the better part of a decade.

But in the last few years, Mr. Guber said, big films with relatively small stories have been hurried into production to meet release dates. Meanwhile, hundreds of pictures with classic narratives have been eclipsed by other media — he mentioned “The Duchess,” a period drama that foundered last month as potential viewers were presumably distracted by the noise of a presidential election — or suppressed by louder, less story-driven brethren.

“How do you compete with ‘Transformers’?” asked Mr. Guber.

Ultimately, he blames the audience for the perceived breakdown in narrative quality: in the end, he argued, consumers get what they want. Bobby Farrelly, a prolific writer, and director with his brother Peter of comedies like “There’s Something About Mary” and “Shallow Hal,” concurred.

“If you go off the beaten path, say, give them something bittersweet, they’re going to tell you they’re disappointed,” Mr. Farrelly said. He spoke from his home in Massachusetts, where he is working on the script for a Three Stooges picture, and said he missed complex stories like that of “The Graduate.”

At the Sundance Institute, as it happens, other deep thinkers tend to think that film storytelling is doing just fine.

“Storytelling is flourishing in the world at a level I can’t even begin to understand,” said Ken Brecher, the institute’s executive director. Mr. Brecher spoke last week, as his colleagues continued sorting through 9,000 films — again, a record — that have been submitted for the coming Sundance Film Festival.

The festival, set for Jan. 15 to Jan. 25 in Park City, Utah, will have story as its theme. The idea, Mr. Brecher said, is to identify film stories that have defined the festival during its 25-year run, and figure out what made them tick. (Mr. Brecher said the final choices had not been made and declined to identify candidates.)

If anything, Mr. Brecher added, technology has simply brought mass storytelling, on film or otherwise, to people who once thought Hollywood had cornered the business.

“One of the most exciting things I’ve run into is a storyteller who’s been texting his stories into the urban centers of Kenya,” said Mr. Brecher, an anthropologist by training.

The people at M.I.T., in any case, may figure out whether classic storytellers like Homer, Shakespeare and Spielberg have had their day.

Starting in 2010, a handful of faculty members — “principal investigators,” the university calls them — will join graduate students, undergraduate interns and visitors from the film and book worlds in examining, among other things, how virtual actors and “morphable” projectors (which instantly change the appearance of physical scenes) might affect a storytelling process that has already been considerably democratized by digital delivery.

A possible outcome, they speculate, is that future stories might not stop in Hollywood all. “The business model is definitely being transformed, maybe even blown apart,” said Frank Moss, a former entrepreneur who is now the media lab’s director.

Mr. Kirkpatrick is not completely at ease with that prospect, partly because his Plymouth Rock Studios, a $480 million enterprise, will need scores of old-fashioned, story-based Hollywood productions to fill the 14 soundstages it plans to build.

In a telephone interview last week, Mr. Kirkpatrick said he might take a cue from Al Gore, who used a documentary film, “An Inconvenient Truth,” to heighten concern about global warming. Mr. Kirkpatrick is now considering an alarm-bell documentary of his own, he said.

Its tentative title: “A World Without Story.”

延伸閱讀

《轉錄》民進黨,長大吧!

為了對抗司法,前總統陳水扁不惜訴諸絕食,引發不少同情甚至激憤的聲援,但在台灣的民主法治好不容易走到今天時,無論朝野,都應該自我約束,一味訴諸情緒而不辨是非大義,甚至控訴迫害侮辱司法,都是對台灣的未來不負責任。

的確,當陳水扁高舉上了手銬的雙手時,很多綠營群眾感到心在淌血,民進黨主席蔡英文也認為是一大羞辱。看到陳水扁絕食多日後的憔悴形影,即使是非綠營民眾,對此幕難免也有不忍之感。但是,重點其實不在這裡,在陳水扁看來可憐的形象背後,是這位前總統及家人涉及的多起重大貪汙弊案,因為爆發弊案,他們才會開始接受司法的必要處理程序。司法是正義良知的最後一道防線,人民靠它來保護自己並規範執政者,否則沒有約束的權力必然腐化。

從檢調展開偵辦動作起,第一家庭就和所有國民一樣,必須接受法律的約束,為自己的行為承擔法律後果,也必須接受司法的裁判。當然,如果對前國家元首多些尊重,外界觀感也許會好一點。但無論如何,恐怕陳水扁終究會以不同方式塑造自己受苦受難的悲壯形象。畢竟再怎麼給予形式上的禮遇,針對貪瀆犯行的偵辦與審判,陳水扁卸任之後,就沒有豁免特權了,而形式的上銬或羈押還是次要,陳水扁真正想要規避的是實質的司法。

惻隱之心人皆有之,但一位曾經權傾一時的前總統,在任期內的所作所為,當然必須接受法律的檢驗,爆出的弊案,也必須一一釐清。民眾可以崇拜他,也可以憎恨他,健康若有問題 必須給予醫療,但他在法律上的權利義務不會因此打任何折扣。更明白講,到底有沒有貪汙,只有證據能說話,只有法官能裁判。這是法律問題,不是人氣問題;是事實問題,不是同情問題。第一家庭弊案涉及的是最基本的是非,是連小學生都知道的「不可以拿不該拿的錢」,不是聲音大就有理,也不是愈可憐就愈無辜。沒有說拿錢在先,絕食自傷在後,就可以因此把犯行無罪化。同樣的,如果司法確認扁家未犯貪瀆之罪,不需要絕食,陳水扁也可以得到應有的清白。

沒有法治,就沒有健全的民主,因為人民將缺乏偵測及割除毒瘤的武器。台灣廿年來逐漸建立起民主政治,曾經深受詬病的司法檢調體系,隨著愈來愈多懷抱理想的新生代投入,以及在人民對司法風骨的期許支持下,迅速展現出超然獨立與不畏強權的堅持,也逐漸建立起公信力,讓民眾在混亂紛擾中,還有一個可以信任的正義仲裁。這是國家未來良性發展的重要基礎,也是台灣的一個珍貴資產。

但憑心而論,最近檢調密集偵辦綠營高官,確實令人有過度群體化的疑惑,未審先押是否適當,也值得進一步討論。和民主一樣,台灣的司法仍在學習改進之中,其中的缺失需要逐一修正,包括若干過時的法規程序,但在此時此刻的台灣,在解嚴廿多年、政黨輪替兩次的台灣,如果民進黨上下仍和二、三十年前一樣控訴司法迫害,或放任黨內人士的煽動激越言行,包括聲稱二二八事件重演,疾呼台灣人被欺負,要去美國告狀。不但讓人有今夕何夕、時光倒流之感,還覺得,如果過了廿年,我們喊的還是一樣的控訴,那台灣這廿年不是都白過了?

真的是如此嗎?還是民進黨這廿年白過了?這究竟是在侮辱台灣、還是在羞辱自己?

司法問題,應該循司法管道解決。檢調是否濫權可以討論,必要時可修法加強規範,不滿判決也可以上訴,直到司法管道還自己清白。但如果對司法只有選擇性的尊重,一旦不利於己,就動輒高喊政治迫害,大演悲情悲壯博人熱淚甚至鼓勵群眾站出來,不但傷害司法好不容易建立的公信力,還顯現出對司法機制的毫無尊敬。

對於扁案,民進黨真正的問題,不在態度尷尬或難以切割或被深綠綁住,而是台灣人民左看右看,耐心地等到現在,還看不見「良心」與「是非」在哪裡。如果民進黨的價值位階中,族群建國高於道德是非,即使國家退化社會對立也無所謂,這樣的政黨,即使真的建國了,請問要怎樣告訴新國家的總統,你不可以貪汙? (中時社論2008-11-18)

延伸閱讀

Edward Burtynsky


Edward Burtynsky is a photographer that is particularly interested in the topic of the destruction that human beings have done to our earth. Basically I enjoy watching stuffs that are related to human figures and aren't necessarily visually comfortable, since to me those seemingly "disgusting" or "horrifying" appearances are strongly related to the desire and all kinds of conflicted emotions or complex shared by all mankind. These photos, however, are so direct that they reveals our destruction over our earth in a silent yet violent way, not allowing you to choose your perspectives or standpoints to feel or interpret what you're watching ── except for admitting, "Yes it is us that are ruining our planet." Not a chance to deny.

Check out more of his work at his website.

延伸閱讀

Monday, November 17, 2008

《轉錄》 "都市繭" by Heather小馬

害怕關心人,
不是因為吝嗇付出,
而是因為不久之後厭倦便會取代衝動的新鮮感。

不相信真愛,
不是因為被甩過,
而是因為從來沒有持續真愛過一個人。

不敢放縱,
不是因為害怕身敗名裂,
而是因為高潮後的乾竭比枯燥無味更令人窒息。

不敢找不熟的人
不是因為擔心別人意圖不軌,
而是因為擔心別人誤會自己意圖不軌。

不敢找熟的人
不是因為害怕暴露自己的弱點,
而是因為害怕別人也開始向自己吐露他們的脆弱。

都市人進退維谷,就這樣悄悄地死在寂寞的繭裡。

延伸閱讀

Beautiful Nothing - Holiday

知道Vimeo已經很久了,但是一直都沒有註冊。沒想到一註冊,隨意亂點就點到這個美到不行的short film. Definitely take a look!

延伸閱讀

Michael on Boston Globe!!


Michael got reported for his and Christine Outram's projects today (Nov 16 East Coast Time). Check out From MIT, a quantum leap in bike mechanics!!

延伸閱讀

Saturday, November 15, 2008

所謂國際化

剛才跟我媽在聊天,講到託人拿東西到東京給我妹。講到一半她說:「....那包肉鬆要兩百多塊台幣...」於是我接話說,我們家真的國際化到一個程度,每次講多少錢都要附帶幣別,到底是台幣還是什麼美金、日圓、英鎊、歐元...老媽就一邊想一邊笑說:「我自己都沒發現這回事,可是沒辦法押!一下子跟你姊在算什麼東西要多少鎊、一下子又跟你妹換成講日幣、然後你每天又在那邊多少K多少K的...」

連肉鬆都要加幣別是怎樣??
我們家可以再怪一點....

延伸閱讀

Thursday, November 13, 2008

接案

西裝褲、襯衫只是一個表示尊重的裝扮;
而反覆地確認確認再確認:這是最好的講法、最好的規劃、最完整的掌握程度、最能讓客戶滿意的樣子,卻是過程裡最可貴的價值所在。

兩次開會前的
熬夜,看起來似乎都是為了一些可有可無的細節,實際上卻是那些我最在意的部份——甚至我想也是那最具核心價值的部份。除了對品牌行銷的透徹理解、對行銷預算轉換成銷售成績的神奇方程式的掌握之外,是夢想的能力。是給客戶的、跟給客戶的客戶的,夢想的能力。

我要學的東西很多很多,尤其是在商業社會裡築夢踏實所需要的那些技巧那些手腕那些拿捏的經驗跟準度。有這些接案的機會跟著大家學,算是運氣很好吧。我總是
被提醒、被包容、被簇擁著,然後一邊學所能夠學的、想學的東西,並在每一次的熬夜討論之後,就突然覺得、自己的經驗值好像從千分之二變成千分之三、再變成千分之四、千分之五......這應該是幸運的吧?

然後不知道為什麼,我似乎看到,這個接案的學習過程會帶我(或我們)到下一個更有趣而不可置信的地方。

延伸閱讀

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

David Altmejd

從J推薦的theselby發現到的artist。很讚很讚值得瞧瞧。 theselby的其他artists也有風格各異的各種有趣東西。

延伸閱讀

有夢最美‧手銬相隨



延伸閱讀

Thursday, November 06, 2008

Obama's Victory Speech

很感動。

延伸閱讀

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

LET THE ISSUE BE THE ISSUE

答案馬上就要揭曉了。很高興能見證這個對全世界而言都極富意義的民主里程碑── the issue is let to be the issue.

延伸閱讀